Rubric

Find Rubric
Keep in mind that 1 student has already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluation.
Empowered (1)
Empowered (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
Application of theory
threshold: pts
100 to >85.0 pts
High Distinction
Skilful and proficient: Meaningfully synthesises connections among professional experiences/case/context to deepen understanding of theory and to broaden own points of view.
85 to >75.0 pts
Distinction
Proficient and effective: Effectively selects examples from professional experience/case/context to illuminate applicable theory. Uses theory to explain own point of view.
75 to >50.0 pts
Credit
Effective and coherent: Reasonable causes or contributing factors of professional experience/case/context are identified and explained using relevant theory.
50 to >0 pts
Fail
Unclear: The explanation of the theory is unclear or inaccurate. The connection between theory and practice is unclear or inaccurate.
pts
100 pts
--
Application of a framework / model
threshold: pts
100 to >85.0 pts
High Distinction
Systematic and skilful: Effective application of model/framework enhancing and bringing forward new ideas regarding professional experience and making recommendations about future practice and or applications.
85 to >75.0 pts
Distinction
Thorough and effective: Examines the connections and disconnections between framework/model and professional experience to draw thoughtful conclusions about practice.
75 to >65.0 pts
Credit
Effective: Uses comparisons and knowledge of others to explain framework/model in the context of professional experience.
65 to >50.0 pts
Pass
Competent: Uses key concepts of framework/model to explain professional experience and own perspective.
50 to >0 pts
Fail
Conducts a basic/simplistic: Unable to draw simple conclusions due to inaccurate use of framework.
pts
100 pts
--
Application of design thinking
threshold: pts
100 to >85.0 pts
High Distinction
Comprehensive and insightful: Comprehensively applies the method/process to context drawing insightful conclusions.
85 to >75.0 pts
Distinction
Thorough and effective: The context is examined using critical elements of the methodology/process to draw thoughtful conclusions.
75 to >65.0 pts
Credit
Effectively explains: Relevant elements of methodology/process are accurately identified and explained in context.
65 to >50.0 pts
Pass
Accurate: Key elements of methodology/process are accurately identified and explained.
50 to >0 pts
Fail
Narrow explanation: The methodology/process is inaccurately applied therefore drawing inaccurate or vague conclusions.
pts
100 pts
--
Application of tool / software
threshold: pts
100 to >85.0 pts
High Distinction
Perceptive: Skilfully and intuitively applies tool/software to create a robust, precise and functional product/artefact.
85 to >75.0 pts
Distinction
Accurate: Accurately applies tool/software to create a functional and reliable product/artefact.
75 to >65.0 pts
Credit
Essential: Sufficiently applies tool/software to create a reliable product/artefact.
65 to >50.0 pts
Pass
Satisfactory: Applies tool/software to create a minimally viable product/artefact/outcome.
50 to >0 pts
Fail
Inaccurate: Inaccurately applies tool/software creating a non-functioning, imprecise or limited product/artefact/outcome.
pts
100 pts
--
Data collection methods, gathering, recording
threshold: pts
100 to >85.0 pts
High Distinction
Proficient: Identifies data collection methods that ensures best outcome for the research question/ objectives /hypothesis. Data is meticulously gathered and recorded using an approach that ensures quality and reliability.
85 to >75.0 pts
Distinction
Confident: Identifies data collection methods that best suits the research question/objectives/hypothesis. Data is gathered and recorded using an approach that ensures quality.
75 to >65.0 pts
Credit
Competent: Identifies data collection methods that align with research question/objectives/hypothesis. Data is gathered and recorded using a consistent approach ensuring validity.
65 to >50.0 pts
Pass
Developing: Identifies data collection methods that aligns with research question/objectives/hypothesis. Data is gathered and recorded within some inconsistencies but still remains valid.
50 to >0 pts
Fail
Not competent: Data collection methods do not align with question/ objectives /hypothesis or do not produce valid data. The data gathering and recoded process is inconsistent or inaccurate.
pts
100 pts
--
Planning
threshold: pts
100 to >85.0 pts
High Distinction
Master – strategic: This is a rigorous and tabulated plan that uses planning tools to be the best advantage. Plan demonstrates a rigorous approach and a clear understanding of the task, resources and development processes.
85 to >75.0 pts
Distinction
Advanced and strategic: A good use of resources and details with clear objectives that are timed to maximise the final product.
75 to >65.0 pts
Credit
Detailed and organized: The plan is fleshed out with pertinent details, and more information is given in terms of statement or work, milestones and procedures that must be followed.
65 to >50.0 pts
Pass
Basic elements met: Purpose, outcomes or products and timeline all mentioned. Indication of what tools/resources are needed are mentioned. There is a clear plan.
50 to >0 pts
Fail
Not competent
pts
100 pts
--
Total Points: 600 out of 600